Treatment of olive mill washing water by ultrafiltration
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Olive oil production requires important quantities of washing water containing low oil concentrations, but classical processes used to recover or to eliminate this oil are ineffective. This study presents a membrane technique to treat olive oil mill washing water using different commercial ultrafiltration membranes: one organic (PCI) and two ceramic (Ceraver) membranes. The influence of the hydrodynamic parameters (transmembrane pressure and flow rate) and the cut‐off membranes on the efficiency of the ultrafiltration process was evaluated, and it was shown the organic PCI membrane could reduce pollution due to organic matter by decreasing the value of the Chemical oxygen demand by about 90%. Moreover, the nature of the ultrafine pore membrane appeared to be an important parameter which may strongly increase or decrease the capacity of the membrane. The membrane cut‐off did not have a strong influence on the performance of the process but if the membrane pores were too large the stability of the dynamically formed membrane decreased at transmembrane pressures greater than 0.2 MPa.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it