MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Simplified Design Equations for Joints in Buried Flexible Pipes Based on Hetényi Solutions

2013· article· en· W2092154848 on OpenAlexaff
Yu Wang, Ian D. Moore

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMechanical stress and fatigue analysis
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJoint (building)Structural engineeringMoment (physics)Parametric statisticsBending momentGeotechnical engineeringShear (geology)Soil structure interactionEngineeringGeologyMathematicsFinite element methodPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Laboratory experiments conducted on corrugated steel, PVC, and high-density polyethylene pipes have demonstrated that deformations in flexible pipes resulting, say, from surface live loads, attenuate rapidly away from the location of load application. As a result, while surface loads in the vicinity of a joint connecting two shallow buried pipe segments influence that joint, the deformations become negligible at the other ends of the two pipe segments. Therefore, solutions for shear, moment, and rotation have been developed assuming that the two pipes are very long, and that the response is not affected by the location or the characteristics of those other joints. This paper presents the formulations of the simplified design equations for flexible pipes, for both moment-transfer and moment-release joints. The design equations are developed using various closed-form solutions for beams on elastic foundations. A parametric study is then presented to examine the factors controlling the structural response of joints in flexible pipes, and comparisons are made to the laboratory experimental measurements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental EngineeringSame topicMechanical stress and fatigue analysisFrench-language works237,207