MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2092161199 · doi:10.1097/nan.0b013e3181f91055

Recommendations for the Use of Intraosseous Vascular Access for Emergent and Nonemergent Situations in Various Health Care Settings

2010· article· en· W2092161199 on OpenAlexaff
Lynn W. Phillips, Jean A. Proehl, Lucinda Brown, Julie Miller, Teri Campbell, Barbara J. Youngberg

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Infusion Nursing · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicCentral Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
Canadian institutionsInternational Air Transport Association
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMillerHealth carePatient careMedicineComputer scienceNursingMedical educationPolitical scienceLawBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Phillips, Lynn MSN, RN, CRNI®; Proehl, Jean MN, RN, CEN, CCRN, CPEN, FAEN; Brown, Lucinda BSN, MSN, RN, CNS; Miller, Julie BSN, RN, CCRN; Campbell, Teri BSN, RN, CEN, CFRN, PHRN; Youngberg, Barbara BSN, MSW, JD, FASHRM Author Information

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.073
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.096

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.073
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.003
Bibliometrics0.0050.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0060.003
Research integrity0.0150.012
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0290.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.430
Teacher spread0.334 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Infusion NursingSame topicCentral Venous Catheters and HemodialysisFrench-language works237,207