Clinical outcomes of pyrazinamide-monoresistant <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i> in Quebec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In Quebec, 6.2% of all tuberculosis (TB) isolates from Canadian-born patients are resistant to pyrazinamide (PZA) alone. The clinical significance of PZA-monoresistant (PZA(MR)) TB is unknown. METHODS: Canadian-born patients with PZA(MR) TB diagnosed between 1 January 1990 and 31 December 2000 and reported in a prior study were compared to randomly selected Canadian-born patients with fully susceptible isolates diagnosed within the same time period. RESULTS: A total of 318 patients were eligible, of whom 40 (12.6%) had missing outcome information. Mean total duration of treatment was respectively 9.0 and 8.9 months for those with PZA(MR) and pan-susceptible strains. Respectively 91% and 89% of PZA(MR) and pan-susceptible patients received at least 6 months of rifampin-containing treatment. Among 67 patients with PZA(MR) TB, 51 (76%) were cured, 3 (4%) relapsed, none failed treatment, and 16 (24%) died within 6 months of diagnosis. Of 211 subjects with fully susceptible isolates, 181 (86%) were cured, 2 (1%) relapsed, 2 (1%) failed treatment, and 30 (14%) died within 6 months of diagnosis. PZA monoresistance was associated with decreased odds of successful clinical outcomes compared with pan-susceptible TB (OR 0.4, 95%CI 0.2-0.8). CONCLUSION: Patients with PZA(MR) TB had significantly worse clinical outcomes than patients with fully susceptible strains.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".