MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Postembryonic expression of the myosin heavy chain genes in the limb, tail, and heart muscles of metamorphosing amphibian tadpoles

2000· review· en· W2092240801 on OpenAlexafffund
Fernand V. Gauthier, Mohammed A. Qadir, Peter A. Merrifield, Burr G. Atkinson

Bibliographic record

VenueMicroscopy Research and Technique · 2000
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPhysiological and biochemical adaptations
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersLondon Health Sciences Centre
KeywordsBiologyTadpole (physics)Gene isoformMyosinMetamorphosisGeneAmphibianMYH7Skeletal muscleGene expressionMajor histocompatibility complexHormoneCell biologyEndocrinologyGeneticsLarvaEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Thyroid hormone is presumed to play a role in initiating and/or orchestrating the postembryonic expression of the genes encoding isoforms of the myosin heavy chains (MHCs) that characterize the muscle fibres in an adult organism. The fact that the postembryonic development of a free-living amphibian tadpole takes place during its thyroid hormone-dependent metamorphosis has made the metamorphosing tadpole an ideal system for elucidating the molecular mechanism(s) by which this hormone affects these postembryonic changes. In this review, we summarize the results from recent studies focused on the postembryonic expression of the MHC genes in the skeletal muscles and hearts of metamorphosing anuran (Rana catesbeiana) tadpoles. The demonstration that mRNAs encoding at least five of the MHC isoforms present in the tadpole tail muscles are also present in the adult hind-limb muscles and that an mRNA encoding a cardiac-specific MHC isoform is present in the heart of both the tadpole and adult organism, rules out the possibility that thyroid hormone initiates the expression of these MHC genes. Instead, it seems more likely that this hormone acts by modulating the expression of one or more of the genes encoding these particular MHC isoforms. Whatever the case, the fact that sequence homology suggests that the five distinct skeletal muscle-specific MHCs are all "fast" isoforms raises the question of how these MHCs are distributed among the three different fibre types described for Rana. On the other hand, the possibility exists that the mRNAs for one or more of these fast MHC isoforms encode developmental isoforms that are present but not translated in the muscles of the tadpole and/or adult frog. Finally, an evaluation of the evolutionary relatedness of the R. catesbeiana MHCs to the MHCs in another species of Rana and to the MHCs in other vertebrates discloses, among other things, that the nucleotide sequence in the R. catesbeiana cardiac MHC isoform is more closely related to the chicken ventricular MHC isoform than it is to any of the other MHC isoforms examined.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.198
Threshold uncertainty score0.476

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.361
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMicroscopy Research and TechniqueSame topicPhysiological and biochemical adaptationsFrench-language works237,207