MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2092255133 · doi:10.1117/12.881041

High performance BOTDA for long range sensing

2011· article· en· W2092255133 on OpenAlexafffund
Xiaoyi Bao, Liang Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Fiber Optic Sensors
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsBrillouin scatteringImage resolutionBrillouin zoneOpticsMultiplexingResolution (logic)Range (aeronautics)Time-division multiplexingPhysicsOptical fiberRemote sensingComputer scienceMaterials scienceTelecommunicationsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The recent progress in long range sensor based on Brillouin scattering has been summarized, the limitation on sensing length, spatial resolution, different approaches to improve the limitation have been discussed. Two examples on frequency division multiplexing (FDM) and time-division-multiplexing (TDM) to extend the sensing range of the distributed Brillouin sensor via BOTDA without inline amplifiers have been proposed and demonstrated. Using FDM concept we demonstrate a 75 km BOTDA with three types of 25 km fiber achieving a spatial resolution of 1.1 m and an accuracy of 1°C/20με at the end of 75 km, and a spatial resolution of 0.5 m and an accuracy of 0.7°C/14με at the end of 50 km. Using TDM technique, we demonstrate a 100 km sensing fiber of 0.6 m and 2 m spatial resolution at the end of 75 km, and at 100 km achieving a Brillouin frequency shift accuracy of 1.5 MHz, this is equivalent to 1.5°C temperature resolution and strain resolution of 30με, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.371
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicAdvanced Fiber Optic SensorsFrench-language works237,207