MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2092268239 · doi:10.1139/p02-116

Thermal behaviour of nitric acid dihydrate in 1:2 HNO<sub>3</sub>/H<sub>2</sub>O solutions

2003· article· en· W2092268239 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Nicolas Lebrun, Fabrice Mahé, Michel Foulon, C. Gors, J.C. Petit

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicSolid-state spectroscopy and crystallography
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNAD+ kinaseNitric acidRaman spectroscopyAnalytical Chemistry (journal)InfraredCrystallographyPhysicsChemistryInorganic chemistryNuclear magnetic resonanceChromatographyEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The liquid-solid phase transitions of 1:2 HNO 3 /H 2 O solutions were investigated in bulk samples. Two forms of nitric acid dihydrate (NAD) (denoted further NAD(I) and NAD(II)) can precipitate. After cooling down to 200 K, NAD(I) crystallizes and melts congruently at 238 K. On cooling down to 173 K, NAD(I) first crystallizes and a polymorphic form NAD(II) appears on heating at about 210 K, which is governed by a nucleation process at temperatures below 200 K. NAD(II) then transforms into nitric acid trihydrate at 235 K via a peritectic reaction. The existence of the two forms is confirmed by Raman studies. Our infrared experiments on bulk samples are in good agreement with those reported in the literature leading to the conclusion that the NAD(I) studied here is also observed in polar-stratospheric-cloud (PSC) particles. In stratospheric conditions, NAD(II) probably cannot freeze in the PSC particles. PACS Nos.: 64.70, 64.60, 61.10, 05.70

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicSolid-state spectroscopy and crystallographyFrench-language works237,207