Le cadre européen des certifications : quelles stratégies nationales d’adaptation ?
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La coordination européenne des politiques de formation professionnelle s’affirme progressivement. Qu’il s’agisse des indicateurs d’objectifs partagés et comparés, des « crédits européens de formation professionnelle », de la mise en place d’un Cadre européen des certifications, ces outils de politique publique européenne interpellent les systèmes nationaux de certification. L’examen, dans quatre pays, de la structure des certifications et des concepts qui les sous-tendent, montre leur diversité tant entre pays qu’au sein d’un même pays. Certaines conceptions sont difficilement compatibles avec celles du cadre européen. On peut alors formuler quelques hypothèses sur les stratégies nationales de transposition de ces certifications dans le nouveau cadre européen.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it