MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2092308968 · doi:10.1021/ef700388a

Effects of Viscous and Capillary Forces on CO<sub>2</sub>Enhanced Oil Recovery under Reservoir Conditions

2007· article· en· W2092308968 on OpenAlex
Morteza Nobakht, Yongan Gu

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy & Fuels · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsPetroleum Technology Research CentreUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnhanced oil recoveryCapillary actionSurface tensionViscous fingeringVolume (thermodynamics)Petroleum engineeringChemistryCapillary pressureCarbon dioxideThermodynamicsCapillary numberMechanicsGeologyPorous mediumOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Carbon dioxide flooding has been proven to be one of the most effective and viable enhanced oil recovery (EOR) processes for light and medium oil reservoirs. In the past, an extremely large number of laboratory experiments and numerical simulations have been conducted to study the CO 2 EOR process. However, the specific effects of viscous and capillary forces on this tertiary oil recovery process are neither thoroughly studied nor well understood yet. In this paper, an experimental study is carried out to examine the detailed effects of viscous and capillary forces on the CO 2 EOR under the actual reservoir conditions. First, the equilibrium interfacial tensions between a light crude oil and CO 2 are measured at different equilibrium pressures. Second, a series of CO 2 coreflood tests are performed to measure the CO 2 EOR at different CO 2 injection pore volumes, pressures, and rates. Each CO 2 coreflood test is terminated after a total of 1.5 pore volume of CO 2 is injected. The detailed experimental results show that, in general, the measured equilibrium interfacial tension is reduced with the equilibrium pressure but the measured CO 2 EOR at 1.5 pore volume of CO 2 is increased with the CO 2 injection pressure and rate. Finally, the measured CO 2 EOR at 1.5 pore volume versus injection pressure data at different CO 2 injection rates are related to the measured equilibrium interfacial tension versus equilibrium pressure data in terms of the complete capillary number, which is defined as the ratio of the viscous force to the capillary force for each CO 2 coreflood test. This study shows that if the complete capillary number is in an intermediate range, the CO 2 EOR increases quickly with the complete capillary number. Otherwise, the CO 2 EOR is lower and remains almost constant for a smaller complete capillary number, or it is higher and remains unchanged for a larger complete capillary number.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it