MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Entrepreneurial Charisma: A Key to Employee Identification?

2006· article· en· W2092318160 on OpenAlexaffabout
Francine Schlosser, Zelimir W Todorovic

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicEntrepreneurship Studies and Influences
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProactivityEntrepreneurial orientationBusinessMarketingValue (mathematics)CharismaBig Five personality traitsInterpersonal communicationPersonalityLeadership styleWork (physics)Empirical researchOrder (exchange)EntrepreneurshipPsychologyPublic relationsSocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Entrepreneurial businesses are an important driver of modern day economies. A firm that adopts a strategy of calculated risks and demonstrates proactiveness and innovation reflects an entrepreneurial orientation (EO). In order to create an entrepreneurial orientation and associated performance outcomes, it is necessary to understand the role of individuals and the interpersonal processes that shape values, norms, and behaviors. Incorporating research from the literature of social psychology, this study examines the effect of individual and organizational variables on employees who work for an entrepreneurial venture. A cross-sectional study of 78 employees of small Canadian businesses empirically demonstrates how an entrepreneurial strategic orientation and a charismatic leadership style encourage employees to identify with the entrepreneurial organization. Empirical results indicate that personality and strategic direction play an important part in creating value for the entrepreneurial firm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Small Business & EntrepreneurshipSame topicEntrepreneurship Studies and InfluencesFrench-language works237,207