MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2092329712 · doi:10.1109/jphot.2011.2175909

Representation of Photonic Crystals and Their Localized Modes Through the Use of Fourier–Bessel Expansions

2011· article· en· W2092329712 on OpenAlexaff
Scott R. Newman, G. C. Gauthier

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE photonics journal · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPhotonic Crystals and Applications
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBessel functionPhysicsFourier transformDielectricSymmetry (geometry)Rotation (mathematics)Photonic crystalRotational symmetryRelaxation (psychology)InversePhotonicsFourier seriesTranslational symmetryRotational invarianceOpticsMathematical analysisQuantum mechanicsGeometryCondensed matter physicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Photonic crystal (PhC) geometry is typically characterized by its translational symmetry. However, it can be treated based on the rotationally symmetry through the use of Fourier-Bessel expansions about the center of rotation. Fourier-Bessel expansions of the inverse dielectric of the structures and the transverse electric (TE) localized modes extract the rotational symmetry that is present. The results show that in PhCs and photonic quasi-crystals, the localizedHzfield contains only the rotational orders that correspond to the rotational order of the dielectric plus and minus the rotational order of the corresponding perfect state. This relationship indicates the potential for simplification within the master equation in cylindrical coordinates that will require further examination.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE photonics journalSame topicPhotonic Crystals and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207