Elastic-Plastic Microcontact Model for Elliptical Contact Areas and Its Application to a Treillis Point in Overhead Electrical Conductors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aeolian vibrations represent a threat to the integrity of electrical transmission lines. The fretting fatigue of conductors is thus a major concern. The modelization of the contact conditions at critical points is an important tool in assessing the life of conductors. Treillis points around the last point of contact between the conductor and the pieces of equipment are such critical points. We observe a fully plastic contact condition at these points. Finite element results for the contact between an ellipsoid and a rigid plane and between two wires at different angles are compared with an elastic-plastic microcontact model for elliptical contact areas. These numerical results are then compared with experimental ones for the contact between two wires of a conductor (ACSR Bersfort), showing a very similar relationship between the contact force and the observed contact area. We have a good correlation between the microcontact model and the finite elements ones in the fully plastic contact regime on both the contact area and the contact force for a given interference between bodies. The use of the elastic-plastic microcontact model for elliptical contacts presented in this paper proves to be a strong tool in getting a better understanding of the mechanical behavior at those critical points.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".