Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette présentation générale a pour but d’expliciter l’arrière-plan théorique et historique des études réunies dans ce numéro dePhilosophiques,lesquelles portent principalement sur l’oeuvre de Husserl durant la période de Halle (1886-1901). Après une description succincte des années d’apprentissage de Husserl en philosophie entre 1876 et ses études avec Brentano à Vienne, je décris les étapes qui ont marqué le développement de sa philosophie de son arrivée à Halle en 1886 jusqu’à la publication desRecherches logiques(1900-1901) : ses études sous la direction de C. Stumpf, la publication du premier volume de saPhilosophie de l’arithmétique, les recherches relatives au projet de la rédaction du deuxième volume de cet ouvrage, l’abandon de ce projet et l’élaboration de la phénoménologie desRecherches logiques. La dernière partie est un examen sommaire des enjeux philosophiques sous-jacents à ladisputatioautour d’un ouvrage récent sur Husserl.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".