MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2092366681 · doi:10.1159/000072341

Expression of Phosphatidylethanolamine N-Methyltransferase in Human Hepatocellular Carcinomas

2003· article· en· W2092366681 on OpenAlexaff
Luciana Tessitore, Barbara Marengo, Dennis E. Vance, Mauro Papotti, Antonio Mussa, Maria Grazia Daidone, Aurora Costa

Bibliographic record

VenueOncology · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFolate and B Vitamins Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersMedical Research Council
KeywordsHepatocellular carcinomaMethyltransferaseCancer researchPhosphatidylethanolamineBiologyPathologyMedicineOncologyGeneGeneticsMethylation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: Hepatic phosphatidylethanolamine is converted into phosphatidylcholine by the enzyme phosphatidylethanolamine N-methyltransferase (PEMT) when the dietary choline supply is inadequate. Our previous reports implicated PEMT in the regulation of hepatocyte growth and transformation. In the present study, we analyzed PEMT activity, PEMPT gene status and its mRNA expression in 29 human hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC). METHODS: The status of the PEMPT gene and PEMT2 mRNA expression were evaluated with Southern and Northern blotting, respectively, in HCC and the noninvolved liver. PEMT activity was assessed by biochemical assay. Cell proliferation markers were defined by immunohistochemical or histoautoradiographic methods. RESULTS: PEMT activity was lower in HCC than in the noninvolved liver and it was negligible in 62% of the tumors. No deletions or mutations of the PEMPT gene were found and PEMT2 mRNA expression was absent or reduced in HCC compared with peritumoral liver tissue. PEMT2 mRNA expression was inversely related to tumor proliferation and to histologic grade. Patients whose HCC did not express PEMT2 mRNA showed poorer outcomes for cancer-related survival than those with PEMT2-positive HCC. CONCLUSIONS: The present findings suggest that (1). clones lacking PEMT2 expression may have been selected during liver tumorigenesis and progression, and (2). PEMT2 expression seems to be associated with clinical progression.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOncologySame topicFolate and B Vitamins ResearchFrench-language works237,207