MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2092373006 · doi:10.1109/hic.2014.7038903

Medical remote observational and diagnostic telemonitoring (MedROAD)

2014· article· en· W2092373006 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Pierre Boulanger, Peter W. Wood, C. Papadas, Harald Becher

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicMobile Health and mHealth Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsObservational studyComputer scienceTelemedicineService (business)Medical informationHealth careKnowledge managementMedicineBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The MedROAD project aims at providing most of the fundamental diagnostic tests normally available in large hospitals in a completely mobile platform, making them available to rural communities and remote populations where access to medical clinics is difficult and sometimes impossible. In the proposed system, clinical information is made available to remote physicians via access to a secure web server specifically designed for medical information storage and analysis. This system is designed to help medical professionals with low levels of experience in the operations of any of the available tests, to perform them accurately and efficiently so that a remote physician may provide expert opinion on diagnosis and treatment options. One of the main goals of this project is to determine if patients using MedROAD can benefit from short and long-term improvements in health outcomes, and develop a stronger satisfaction from this health service.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.055

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.452
Teacher spread0.376 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMobile Health and mHealth Applications→French-language works237,207→