Procedure and datasets to compute links between genes and phenotypes defined by MeSH keywords
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<ns4:p>Algorithms mining relationships between genes and phenotypes can be classified into several overlapping categories based on how a phenotype is defined: by training genes known to be related to the phenotype; by keywords and algorithms designed to work with disease phenotypes. In this work an algorithm of linking phenotypes to Gene Ontology (GO) annotations is outlined, which does not require training genes and is based on algorithmic principles of Genes to Diseases (G2D) gene prioritization tool. In the outlined algorithm phenotypes are defined by terms of Medical Subject Headings (MeSH). GO annotations are linked to phenotypes through intermediate MeSH D terms of drugs and chemicals. This inference uses mathematical framework of fuzzy binary relationships based on fuzzy set theory. Strength of relationships between the terms is defined through frequency of co-occurrences of the pairs of terms in PubMed articles and a frequency of association between GO annotations and MeSH D terms in NCBI Gene gene2go and gene2pubmed datasets. Three plain tab-delimited datasets that are required by the algorithm are contributed to support computations. These datasets can be imported into a relational MySQL database. MySQL statements to create tables are provided. MySQL procedure implementing computations that are performed by outlined algorithm is listed. Plain tab-delimited format of contributed tables makes it easy to use this dataset in other applications.</ns4:p>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".