Reactions of [H<sub>2</sub>Os<sub>3</sub>(CO)<sub>10</sub>] with Conjugated Diynes (RC<sub>2</sub>C<sub>2</sub>R‘) Containing Nucleophilic Oxygen in β Position of a Substituent (R = Ph, R‘ = CH<sub>2</sub>OH, C(O)Ph; R = R‘ = CMe<sub>2</sub>(OH))
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reactions of [H 2 Os 3 (CO) 10 ] with a series of diynes, RC 2 C 2 R‘ ( 1: R = Ph, R‘ = CH 2 OH; 2: R = Ph, R‘ = C(O)Ph; 3: R = R‘ = C(OH)Me 2 ), have been studied. It was found that upon coordination to the triosmium cluster, the nucleophilic oxygens of the R‘ substituents of 1 and 2 take part in intramolecular cyclization reactions to give [HOs 3 (CO) 10 {μ-η 1:η 2 -PhCH 2 (C CH−C CH−O)}] ( 5 ) and [HOs 3 (CO) 10 {μ-η 1:η 1 -Ph(C CH−C C−O)CPh}] ( 6 ), respectively, both of which contain furan rings coordinated to the cluster core. On heating of the latter compound, the furan moiety remains intact, but a carbonyl group dissociates from the cluster, leading to the formation of [HOs 3 (CO) 9 (μ 3 -η 1:η 3:η 1 -Ph(C CH−C C−O)CPh)] ( 7 ) with a closed “C 3 Os 3 ” pentagonal pyramidal structure. Reaction of [H 2 Os 3 (CO) 10 ] with 3 does not lead to cyclization of the diyne; instead, the clusters [Os 3 (CO) 10 {μ 3 -η 2 -(RCH CH−C 2 R)}] ( 8 ) and [Os 3 (CO) 10 {μ 3 -η 2 -(RC 2 C 2 R)}] ( 9 ) are formed. Deuterium labeling of the starting compounds has been used in the reaction of [H 2 Os 3 (CO) 10 ] with HOCH 2 C 2 C 2 CH 2 OH in order to investigate possible mechanisms of the cyclization reaction. The crystal and molecular structures of clusters 5, 7, and 9 are presented.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.011 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".