Gametogenesis in capelin, <i>Mallotus villosus</i> (Müller), in the northwest Atlantic Ocean
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Capelin (Mallotus villosus) can be regarded as the most important prey item in the northwest Atlantic Ocean. The health and availability of this species are of fundamental importance for the successful growth and reproduction of many other fishes, whales, and birds. In spite of the clear need to understand this species, the life history of the capelin, especially its reproductive biology, is not well understood. This study substantially improves our knowledge of the reproductive biology of capelin and should be of particular interest to resource managers and administrators. Capelin gonads were analysed over three successive seasons using fish collected during beach spawning (June and July 1993, July 1994, July 1995) or trawled between spawnings, with 11 separate samples (fall, winter, and spring from October 1993 to June 1995). Few immature fish were collected in the trawls; 13/130 (10%) males and 3/150 (2%) females. No recovering (postspawning) males were found in the trawls, but 8/150 (5.3%) recovering females were identified on the basis of large residual oocytes (ovulated or unovulated) and (or) (in the fall) a thicker ovarian wall. Recovering females were identified as late as 10 months post spawning on the basis of residual oocytes. The essential semelparity of males was supported by a lack of apparent spermatogonia during advanced spermatogenesis, whereas the females' capacity to spawn in a subsequent year (iteroparity) was confirmed by the presence of small nonvitellogenic oocytes when other cells were in late oogenesis, in addition to the identification of recovering fish. Oocytes were separable into four stages (potential year classes) and changes occurred in all oocyte stages throughout the cycle of oogenesis. Gametogenesis was more advanced in longer fish, indicating that larger fish spawn earlier than smaller fish.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".