MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2092408786 · doi:10.1159/000084806

The Effect of Chewing Gums Containing Calcium Phosphates on the Remineralization of Artificial Caries-Like Lesions in situ

2005· article· en· W2092408786 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueCaries Research · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDentistry
TopicOral microbiology and periodontitis research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDentistryCitationHard tissueMedicineLibrary scienceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Research Articles| May 13 2005 The Effect of Chewing Gums Containing Calcium Phosphates on the Remineralization of Artificial Caries-Like Lesions in situ Subject Area: Dental Medicine , Further Areas A. Itthagarun; A. Itthagarun aPaediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar N.M. King; N.M. King aPaediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar C. Yiu; C. Yiu aPaediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar C. Dawes C. Dawes bDepartment of Oral Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Caries Res (2005) 39 (3): 251–254. https://doi.org/10.1159/000084806 Article history Received: February 23 2004 Accepted: July 15 2004 Published Online: May 13 2005 Content Tools Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation A. Itthagarun, N.M. King, C. Yiu, C. Dawes; The Effect of Chewing Gums Containing Calcium Phosphates on the Remineralization of Artificial Caries-Like Lesions in situ. Caries Res 1 June 2005; 39 (3): 251–254. https://doi.org/10.1159/000084806 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentAll JournalsCaries Research Search Advanced Search Article PDF first page preview Close Modal Keywords: Artificial caries, Chewing gum, Dicalcium phosphate, Phoscal®, Remineralization, Urea © 2004 S. Karger AG, Basel2005Copyright / Drug Dosage / DisclaimerCopyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements. You do not currently have access to this content.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.150
Threshold uncertainty score0.507

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.393
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it