MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2092418205 · doi:10.1142/s0129055x02001338

ERGODIC THEOREMS FOR 2D STATISTICAL HYDRODYNAMICS

2002· review· en· W2092418205 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueReviews in Mathematical Physics · 2002
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStability and Controllability of Differential Equations
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilMcMaster University
KeywordsErgodic theoryUniquenessMathematicsCentral limit theoremHomogeneity (statistics)LimitingLaw of large numbersFourier transformLimit (mathematics)Mathematical analysisStationary ergodic processStatistical physicsPure mathematicsMathematical physicsInvariant measurePhysicsRandom variableStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider the 2D Navier–Stokes system, perturbed by a random force, such that sufficiently many of its Fourier modes are excited (e.g. all of them are). We discuss the results on the existence and uniqueness of a stationary measure for this system, obtained in last years, homogeneity of the measures and some their limiting properties. Next we use these results to prove that solutions of the equations obey the central limit theorem and the strong law of large numbers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.765
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it