Early and Sustained Systemic and Renal Hemodynamic Effects of Intravenous Radiocontrast
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: To measure the extended renal hemodynamic changes induced by intravenous radiocontrast. METHODS: Cross-ewes were studied in a randomized cross-over study. Intravenous saline or radiocontrast were administered, and continuous measurement of cardiac output and renal blood flow (RBF) was performed with flow probes. RESULTS: Radiocontrast induced early but transient increases in cardiac output with vasodilatation, followed by return to baseline values within 2 h. There was an initial decline in RBF (-5.2 +/- 4.5 vs. 2.1 +/- 5.3%; p < 0.0001) and decreased renal vascular conductance (-4.0 +/- 7.2 vs. 3.3 +/- 7.1%, p < 0.0001; vasoconstriction). This renal vasoconstriction resolved within 2 h and was followed by sustained (72 h) renal vasodilatation with higher RBF (270 +/- 13 vs. 236 +/- 11 ml/min; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Radiocontrast induces short renal vasoconstriction followed by sustained vasodilatation and increased RBF. Short-term studies are not representative of the overall sustained renal hemodynamic effects of radiocontrast.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it