Bibliographic record
Abstract
Over 1000 previously unused Canadian auroral observations from manuscript sources between 1771 and 1819 are examined. They are especially reliable because they are part of meteorological registers which simultaneously contain information on cloudiness and are significant because they add substantially to the scarce database of historical records, especially from high geomagnetic latitudes (57° < Φ 1800 < 70°). The statistics derived from these data show an interval of low auroral activity from about 1785 to 1815, a decade earlier than the Dalton solar activity minimum, superimposed on a fairly regular periodicity of about 11 years and seasonal variations. The relationship between the auroral occurrence frequency and solar activity from 1795 to 1815 is similar to what is normally seen at lower latitudes suggesting that the auroral oval contracted more than usual during the Dalton minimum. The data support the type of relationship found by Ohl, which directly relates the frequency of auroral occurrence at high latitudes during the declining portion of one solar cycle to the sunspot number at the following maximum and the rapidity with which the solar activity returns to a maximum.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".