MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2092442778 · doi:10.1007/s13213-011-0248-z

Biocontrol potential of a Bacillus subtilis strain against Bactrocera oleae

2011· article· en· W2092442778 on OpenAlex
Mohammed Mostakim, Soumya Elabed, Mohamed Iraqui, Kawtar Fikri-Benbrahim, Houari Abdellah, Abdelilah S. Gounni, Saâd Ibnsouda Koraichi

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Microbiology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInsect Resistance and Genetics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyBactroceraBacillus subtilisPEST analysisBiological pest controlLarvaStrain (injury)Microbiology16S ribosomal RNAMediterranean BasinInfestationBacteriaTephritidaeBotanyMediterranean climateEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Within the Mediterranean basin, pest infestation of the olive tree especially by Bactrocera oleae is a serious economic problem. In this study, we have isolated 115 bacterial strains from various ecological niches, and tested their ability to protect the olive fruits against Bactrocera oleae . Among these strains, culture supernatant (CS) of one bacterial strain displayed the highest rate of larval mortality, and was identified as Bacillus subtilis by 16S rRNA molecular analysis. Further characterization of the CS of the Bacillus sp. strain showed that the highest insecticidal activity against third instar larvae occurs at pH 7. Our results indicate that this bacteria strain may be a prospective alternative in pest control programs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.637

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it