Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’État étant une idée (Burdeau, 1970, 14), nous devons comprendre les fondements intellectuels qui sous-tendent son existence. L’État canadien tel qu’il est défini dans la seconde moitié du xixe siècle apparaît, du point de vue des provinces centrales, comme le fruit d’un compromis politique et idéologique entre divers groupes et tirant sa genèse de la période allant de 1838 à 1840. Bien que l’historiographie les ait négligées, ces années constituent le creuset duquel émerge le Canada moderne. À cette époque charnière où l’espace canadien doit être redéfini vu les graves troubles politiques coloniaux, les intellectuels, les politiciens et les groupes de pression explicitent leur vision de l’avenir des deux Canadas et proposent leurs solutions à l’impasse constitutionnelle. À partir des définitions théoriques du libéralisme et du nationalisme, nous tâchons de mettre en lumière les points de rencontre entre les divers intervenants (tory ou réformistes, coloniaux ou métropolitains). Ces éléments laissent entrevoir les bases sur lesquelles s’édifiera le Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.103 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".