MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2092509450 · doi:10.1139/p02-041

Lowest order constrained variational and local density approximation approach to the hot alpha particle

2002· article· en· W2092509450 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
M. Modarres, H. R. Moshfegh, Hodjat Mariji

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicHigh-Energy Particle Collisions Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersArgonne National Laboratory
KeywordsPhysicsNuclear matterHarmonic oscillatorParticle densityPhase transitionQuantum mechanicsAtomic physicsQuantum electrodynamicsNucleon

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The free energy of an alpha particle is calculated using the local density approximation in the harmonic oscillator basis. The effective two-body interactions are generated from the lowest order constrained variational (LOCV) calculation for nuclear matter at finite temperature, with the Reid and Δ-Reid potentials. The Fermi–Dirac distribution is used to calculate the entropy and the occupation probability of each state of alpha particle at a given temperature. The effective mass is treated as a variational parameter. Our zero temperature results with the Δ-Reid interaction agree well with the experimental saturation data of alpha particle and the other many-body techniques. The flashing temperature of ≈5 MeV is found, which is consistent with experimental evidence. It is concluded that a similar liquid–gas phase transition to that of nuclear matter is most probable in the alpha particle and heavier nuclei. PACS Nos.: 21.65+f, 21.10-k, 21.10Dr, 21.60-n

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicHigh-Energy Particle Collisions ResearchFrench-language works237,207