MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2092523455 · doi:10.1109/oceans.2008.5151825

The OMER human-powered submarine team: From classroom to competition

2008· article· en· W2092523455 on OpenAlexaffabout
S. Joncas, C. Belleau

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOffshore Engineering and Technologies
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubmarineClubClass (philosophy)Competition (biology)PropellerEngineeringAeronauticsComputer scienceMarine engineeringArtificial intelligenceGeologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Omer Human Powered Submarine team is an engineering student club founded in 1991 at the Ecole de technologie Superieure in Montreal, Canada. Student members of the club design and build submarines to participate in international races. For the last decade, the team has been performing extremely well, often dominating the race class they compete in. The team currently holds the speed records of three categories, namely the one-person propeller category with 7.192 knots, the two-person propeller category with 8.035 knots and the one-person non-propeller category with 4.642 knots. This article exposes some of the elements contributing to this success. Design characteristics, student background, faculty support, team management and infrastructure will be some of the topics discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.058

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOffshore Engineering and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207