Thus Says the Lord: Essay on the Former and Latter Prophets in Honor of Robert R. Wilson (review)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Alan Cooper Baruch Levine Carolyn J. Sharp, Yale University Christine Hayes, Yale University Christl Maier, University of Marburg, Germany Christopher Seitz, University of Toronto David Petersen, Emory University Davide Nate Phinney Dean McBride, Union Theological Seminary-Presbyterian School of Christian Education Dennis Olson, Princeton Theological Seminary Gene M. Tucker, Iliff School of Theology Harry Nasuti, Fordham University John Ahn, Austin Presbyterian Theological Seminary John Barton, Oxford University John J. Collins, Yale University Judy Fentress Williams, Virginia Theological Seminary Mark S. Smith, New York University Peter Machinist, Harvard University Roy Heller, Southern Methodist University Stephen Chapman, Duke Divinity School Stephen Cook, Virginia Theological Seminary Susan Niditch, Amherst College Warner Bailey, Texas Christian University William Hallo, Yale University.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it