<i>Banffia constricta</i> , a putative vetulicolid from the Middle Cambrian Burgess Shale
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Although Banffia constricta was first described in 1911, the affinities of this soft-bodied fossil animal have remained unclear. Banffia is redescribed here, on the basis of over 300 specimens. Banffia has a bipartite body measuring up to 10 cm in length. The entire body is axially twisted along a spiral, clockwise as seen from the front. The anterior section consists of two fused carapace-like units with a prominent crown-like structure at the anterior end surrounding the mouth. This crown-like structure is composed of three concentric circlets. A single antenniform outgrowth lies posterior to the mouth. The posterior section of Banffia is composed of 40 to 50 lightly sclerotised segments. The anus is terminal, and situated in a caudal notch. The gut is straight. Simple serially repeated structures along the gut may represent metameric mid-gut diverticulae. Banffia is considered to have been an epibenthic gregarious animal and possibly a deposit-feeder. Banffia is putatively classified as an end-member of the phylum Vetulicolia, in a new class, the Banffozoa. If the vetulicolids represent a stem-group deuterostome, the absence of gills and a possible endostyle in Banffia is problematic. The presence of mid-gut diverticulae in Banffia may represent a link with the protostomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".