MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2092637470 · doi:10.1007/s00134-006-0217-3

Quality of life after acute respiratory distress syndrome: a meta-analysis

2006· review· en· W2092637470 on OpenAlexafffund
David W. Dowdy, Mark P. Eid, Cheryl Dennison Himmelfarb, Pedro A. Mendez-Tellez, Margaret S. Herridge, Eliseo Güallar, Peter J. Pronovost, Dale M. Needham

Bibliographic record

VenueIntensive Care Medicine · 2006
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchRoyal College of Physicians and Surgeons of CanadaNational Institutes of HealthU.S. Public Health ServiceJohns Hopkins University
KeywordsMedicineARDSCINAHLQuality of life (healthcare)PopulationAnesthesiologyMEDLINEConfidence intervalObservational studyPhysical therapyMeta-analysisIntensive care unitIntensive care medicineEmergency medicinePsychological interventionInternal medicinePsychiatryLung

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0120.022
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.117
GPT teacher head0.407
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations342
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueIntensive Care MedicineSame topicIntensive Care Unit Cognitive DisordersFrench-language works237,207