MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2092678894 · doi:10.1309/edal-r8ha-u3el-t37d

Primary Cutaneous Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

2002· article· en· W2092678894 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Clinical Pathology · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders research
Canadian institutionsBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDiffuse large B-cell lymphomaLymphomaCD20ThighPathologyCD5Large-cell lymphomaSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Primary cutaneous diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is an uncommon lymphoma. Some authors have suggested that large B-cell lymphoma can be segregated based on anatomic site, with tumors of the lower extremity being unique. We report 15 cases of primary cutaneous DLBCL. Each case was analyzed immunohistochemically using antibodies specific for CD3, CD5, CD10, CD20, bcl-2, bcl-6, and p53. Polymerase chain reaction analysis for t(14;18)(q32;q21) also was performed. There were 13 men and 2 women (median age, 64 years). Thirteen tumors were composed predominantly of centroblasts, and 2 were immunoblastic. There was a median follow-up of 72 months. Of the 4 patients with primary cutaneous DLBCL of the lower extremity (thigh, knee, leg), 2 (50%) experienced a recurrence and 1 patient died of disease. In the non-lower extremity cases, 18% (2/11) recurred and no patients died of disease. We conclude that primary cutaneous DLBCL usually occurs in elderly patients with a male predominance. Recurrences are common, but death of disease is rare.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.591
Threshold uncertainty score0.734

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it