MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2092711258 · doi:10.1037/h0087044

Preparing psychology and psychologists for new health care markets.

2006· article· en· W2092711258 on OpenAlexaffabout
Michael C. King

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsAlberta Health Services
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyApplied psychologyConsulting psychologyAbnormal psychologyPsychotherapistSchool psychologyClinical psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Because our training models in Clinical Psychology have not kept pace with the rapid changes in the health care marketplace, we may be in danger of preparing psychologists for markets that no longer exist. The next generations of psychologists will require the skills of the entrepreneur and the leader in addition to a range of core clinical skills. At the same time, our profession's historic commitment to science as the best epistemic game in town may founder if we fail to pay better attention to knowledge translation (i.e., how to move scientific findings expeditiously from the laboratory into practice). Two recent incidents helped crystallize my thinking about the challenges to psychology and psychologists from continuing changes in the health care marketplace.1 In the first instance, I served as a member of a working group in the Calgary Health Region designing a new ambulatory rehabilitation program that is designed to move all outpatient rehabilitation care out of the acute care sites and into the community. When operational in 2007, three community centres will provide comprehensive rehabilitation care to a diverse population, including patients with musculoskeletal injuries, amputees, neurologically ill patients, and frail seniors. The funding model for the community ambulatory rehabilitation program provided for one psychologist to provide service to all three centres and all these populations. As part of the planning exercise, the day came when the group turned to me and asked: What model of psychological services is there for this kind of program and where can we find a psychologist trained to do this work? My answer was: There isn't any model of care. We don't train psychologists for this kind of work. This is a brand new market and whoever comes to it is essentially going to have to make it up as he or she goes along. In the second instance, the Calgary Health Region leaders have realized, perhaps belatedly, the serious impact of chronic illness on the populations we serve and decided to develop a comprehensive program of care to address the needs of these populations. The initial focus of the Chronic Disease Management Strategy is on patients with diabetes, hypertension, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Much evidence converges on the conclusion that it makes sense to consider these and many other chronic illnesses to be behaviour disorders, because the kinds of things that lead to and maintain them have to do with how people act, think, and feel. Not surprisingly, Chronic Disease Management program development activities have focused heavily on habit change, lifestyle modification, and on enhancing readiness to change, all of the things that would appear to be right up psychology's professional alley. Although psychologists are involved in various aspects of these programs and in the program development activity itself, my more urgent question is: Why aren't we in charge of this? These two situations reflect the changing face of health care provision in Canada. They challenge psychology's traditional methods of preparing students for practice and the way psychology provides practitioners with the tools that they need for such practice. I propose, first, that although the health care marketplace has changed substantially, our training models and methods have not. The challenge for the next generation of psychologists and for those who train them is to prepare new graduates with the skills necessary to anticipate and adapt to entirely new markets. In addition to the clinical knowledge, skills, and judgment that we currently develop in our students and young psychologists, we need to equip them with two other critical skill sets: those of the entrepreneur and those of the leader. Second, I consider that the most critical issue for psychological training and practice in the future is no longer whether we are scientist-practitioners, scholar-practitioners, scientists, practitioners, or any other of the entities that have preoccupied us in training for the past 50 years. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.728
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.384
Teacher spread0.346 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienneSame topicPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207