Psychosocial Determinants of Relapse in Ulcerative Colitis: A Longitudinal Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To determine the association between psychosocial characteristics and time to relapse in patients with inactive ulcerative colitis. METHODS: Sixty patients with clinically and endoscopically inactive ulcerative colitis were followed for 1 yr, or less if they relapsed. Demographic, psychosocial, and clinical data were obtained. Stressful life events (Psychiatric Epidemiology Research Interview Life Events Scale), psychological distress (Symptom Checklist-90R), and perceived stress (Perceived Stress Scale) were recorded monthly by self-report. Multivariate time-dependent Cox regression was used to identify the independent determinants of earlier time to clinical relapse. RESULTS: The patients' mean age was 39 yr (SD = 9.4), 37 (62%) were female, and 22 (37%) relapsed during the 1-yr follow-up. Univariate Cox regression indicated a weak association between number of stressful events in the preceding month and time to relapse (p = 0.09). This association strengthened in multivariate analysis (p = 0.02, hazard ratio = 1.26 per event, 95% CI = 1.04-1.53) after adjustment for significant covariates. CONCLUSIONS: After controlling for demographic and clinical variables, more recent stressful events were associated with earlier time to relapse. These findings, which support a biopsychosocial model of disease, might help clinicians identify patients who might benefit from more intensive maintenance medical therapy and behavioral medicine interventions to reduce stress and improve coping.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".