MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2092722472 · doi:10.1002/cm.20394

Interactions of MAP/microtubule affinity regulating kinases with the adaptor complex AP‐2 of clathrin‐coated vesicles

2009· article· en· W2092722472 on OpenAlexaff
Gerold Schmitt‐Ulms, Dorthe Matenia, Gerard Drewes, Eva‐Maria Mandelkow

Bibliographic record

VenueCell Motility and the Cytoskeleton · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicrotubule and mitosis dynamics
Canadian institutionsOccupational Cancer Research CentreUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClathrinMicrotubuleBiologyCell biologySignal transducing adaptor proteinClathrin adaptor proteinsCytoskeletonVesicleMicrotubule-associated proteinSH3 domainColocalizationKinaseEndocytosisPhosphorylationCellProto-oncogene tyrosine-protein kinase SrcBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

MARK [microtubule-associated proteins (MAPs)/microtubule affinity regulating kinase]/Par-1 (partition defective) phosphorylate MAPs tau, MAP2 and MAP4 at KXGS motifs and thereby regulate microtubule dynamics and transport processes in cells [Drewes et al., Cell1997;89:297-308]. We report here that MARK copurifies with clathrin-coated vesicles (CCVs) via interaction with the adaptor complex AP-2. The adaptin binding site on MARK includes the regulatory loop of its catalytic domain. Immunofluorescence demonstrates the colocalization of MARK with AP-2 and clathrin, as well as other MARK-interacting proteins such as PAK5. The results are consistent with an observed influence of MARK on the trafficking of CCVs. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 2009. (c) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCell Motility and the CytoskeletonSame topicMicrotubule and mitosis dynamicsFrench-language works237,207