Investigation of the Poly(<scp>l</scp>-lactide)/Poly(<scp>d</scp>-lactide) Stereocomplex at the Air−Water Interface by Polarization Modulation Infrared Reflection Absorption Spectroscopy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The polarization modulation infrared reflection−absorption spectroscopy (PM-IRRAS) technique has been used in situ to determine the orientation and molecular structure of an equimolar mixture of poly( l -lactide) (PLLA) and poly( d -lactide) (PDLA) spread at the air−water interface. The characteristics of the compression isotherm and of the PM-IRRAS spectra give clear evidence for the presence of a PLLA/PDLA stereocomplex. One of the most striking features in the PM-IRRAS spectra of the stereocomplex is the derivative shape of the band due to the C O stretching vibration, providing a spectral signature of the presence of polylactide helices oriented parallel to the water surface. The positive and the negative components of the C O band observed at 1749 and 1765 cm - 1 are assigned to the A and E modes of the helical structure, respectively. This assigment was confirmed by recording transmission spectra of the transferred stereocomplex at normal and oblique incidence. Compression of the monolayer past 17 Å 2 /repeat unit results in the formation of a bilayer structure. The surface pressure−area isotherm and the PM-IRRAS features suggest that the structure of the film at the air−water interface is similar to the three-dimensional crystal structure of the PLLA/PDLA stereocomplex. In the bulk crystalline structure, the molecules adopt a 3 1 -helix conformation, and a segment of a PLLA molecule is paired with a segment of a PDLA molecule, resulting in a racemic unit cell. The PM-IRRAS technique is thus shown to provide detailed insight into the structure of these polymeric Langmuir films and definitely shows that helical polymeric structures can be directly observed at the air−water interface.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".