MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2092758925 · doi:10.1128/jb.01619-09

Interactions of the RNA-Binding Protein Hfq with<i>cspA</i>mRNA, Encoding the Major Cold Shock Protein

2010· article· en· W2092758925 on OpenAlexafffund
Janet S. Hankins, Heather C. Denroche, G A Mackie

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Bacteriology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA Research and Splicing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsBiologyCold-shock domainPolynucleotide phosphorylaseMessenger RNARNAPolyadenylationRNase PDirectionalityMolecular biologyRNA-binding proteinCell biologyGeneticsBiochemistryGeneEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CspA, a small protein that is highly induced by cold shock, is encoded by a monocistronic mRNA of 428 nucleotides (nt) whose half-life and abundance are greatly increased following cold shock. We show here that in vitro cspA mRNA can bind multiple copies of Hfq, a hexameric Sm-like protein which promotes a variety of RNA-RNA interactions. Binding of the first Hfq hexamer occurs with an apparent K(d) (dissociation constant) of <40 nM; up to seven additional hexamers can bind sequentially at higher concentrations. Known ligands of Hfq, including the small regulatory RNA, RyhB, compete with cspA mRNA. Several experiments suggest that the first binding site to be occupied by Hfq is located at or near the 3' end of cspA mRNA. The consequences of limited Hfq binding in vitro include nearly total inhibition of RNase E cleavage at a site approximately 35 nt from the 3' end of the mRNA, stimulation of polyadenylation by poly(A) polymerase 1, and subsequent exonucleolytic degradation by polynucleotide phosphorylase. We propose that Hfq may play a facilitating role in the metabolism of cspA mRNA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of BacteriologySame topicRNA Research and SplicingFrench-language works237,207