Click-Chemistry Reactions in Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry: Fast & Easy Introduction of Radiolabels into Biomolecules for In Vivo Imaging
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Today the term "click chemistry" is often used equivalent with the copper-catalyzed 1,3-dipolar Huisgen cycloaddition. Originally, the concept was introduced in 2001 to describe reactions fulfilling a set of criteria that are most useful for chemical syntheses in drug research. In radiopharmaceutical chemistry where short lived radioisotopes are introduced into various different substance classes for in vivo imaging of biochemical processes, the expanding field of radioactive bioconjugation has become predominant. Labeled biomolecules such as peptides, proteins and oligonucleotides generated via bioconjugation of chelators for radiometal introduction as well as novel valuable secondary precursors for (18)F labeling have enriched the growing field of molecular imaging substantially. When introducing radioactive nuclides with a very short half-life into biomolecules, some of the typical criteria defined by click-chemistry are more crucial than others. Time is always the most important issue, whereas avoiding the formation of by-products that have to be removed without chromatography is of minor importance. The short-lived radionuclide (11)C for example has a physical half-life of only 20 min so that the labeling procedure cannot exceed 40-60 minutes (2-3 half-lifes). In this contribution, we outline reactions and molecules which meet the requirements of click chemistry reactions and are suitable for radiosyntheses of short lived SPECT ((99m)Tc: t(1/2) = 6 h, (111)In: t(1/2) = 2.81 d) and PET ((11)C: t(1/2) = 20.3 min to (64)Cu: t(1/2) = 12.7 h) radiotracers for in vivo imaging of biological processes and review the contributions in the field of radiochemical "click-reactions" - 1,3-dipolar Huisgen cycloadditions and beyond.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".