Mortality of Zooplankton and Invertebrate Larvae Exposed to Cyclonic Pre-Treatment and Ultraviolet Radiation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Experiments were carried out to determine the effect of an integrated ballast water treatment system on the mortality of zooplankton. This treatment system consists of 2 treatment stages: 1) the cyclonic pretreatment phase and: 2) the ultraviolet radiation phase. Various zooplankton species were exposed to the treatment system over a range of 6 ultraviolet dosages (UV-C). In general, both treatment phases exhibited significant effects on zooplankton mortality. The results revealed that clam, mussel, and oyster larvae exhibited statistically similar mortality thresholds ranging between 96% and 99% at the higher UV dosages. A significant difference was observed when comparing these results to the mortality thresholds of brine shrimp nauplii (77%) and a natural population of zooplankton (40%). These findings suggest that species grouped into similar taxa may exhibit similar mortality responses to ultraviolet radiation, while those taxa containing different structural tissues capable of different photoprotective properties may exhibit different mortality responses. In addition, time-dependent, post-treatment mortality observations varied according to the taxa present, demonstrating that biological assays should include time-dependent mortality estimates to accurately assess the efficiencies of ballast water treatment systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".