MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2092830612 · doi:10.1353/cat.2015.0027

Conflict and Conversion: Catholicism in Southeast Asia, 1500–1700 by Tara Alberts (review)

2015· article· en· W2092830612 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Luke Clossey

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œCatholic historical review · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicVietnamese History and Culture Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScholarshipHistoryPoliticsSoutheast asiaPopulationAncient historyChinaEthnologyPolitical scienceLawSociologyArchaeologyDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Conflict and Conversion: Catholicism in Southeast Asia, 1500–1700 by Tara Alberts Luke Clossey Conflict and Conversion: Catholicism in Southeast Asia, 1500–1700. By Tara Alberts. (New York: Oxford University Press. 2014. Pp. xviii, 242. $125.00. ISBN 978-0-19-964626-5.) The position of Southeast Asia between India and China, two central population cores, has contributed to its extraordinary diversity (especially, and most challenging for historians, of languages) and importance (proverbially, events here controlled prices in Venice), even though it remains the most understudied history of major world regions. In her introduction Tara Alberts reminds us of the attraction and significance of the region for early-modern Europeans, which makes its neglect today all the more painful, and her scholarship all the more welcome. The relative obscurity of the region allows Alberts to present scholarship that intrigues because of the sources, rather than because of new interpretations; her extensive archival work means much of this material will be new even to students of Southeast Asia. The volume looks specifically at three places, well chosen for their distinctiveness in missionary outlook: Malacca (in modern Malaysia) with its “fanatical” Muslims; Ayutthaya (roughly modern Thailand) with its “apathetic” Buddhists; and Tonkin and Cochinchina (roughly modern Vietnam), where Christianity’s prospects seemed—and proved to be—brighter. This is the story of missionaries coming from a complex institutional background to lands equally complex in their culture and politics; in the first parcel of chapters, Alberts provides readers new to either world with lucid introductions. Next comes a shorter study of missionary methods, with substantial subsections considering their mode of dress, their use of science and healing, and their development of a catechetical literature. The [End Page 183] final third turns formally to the converts, considering their engagement with the sacraments and devotions of the Church before focusing on two specific groups of converts: women and slaves. A favored sentence opener, sometimes thrice in a single paragraph, is “Yet …” This is an account that derives its forward momentum less from a one-directional interpretive argument than from all the U-turns inherent in the messiness of sources documenting human life. Readers get a sense of the processes of conversion and resistance, information well organized and well indexed for readers. The text is thickly footnoted; the bibliography stretches to thirty pages. Concise methodological reflections will likely check off the theorists’ boxes without trying the patience of the empiricists. The contours of Alberts’s commentary largely follow trends in the recent scholarship of Southeast Asia, where Islam and especially women have become popular topics. Although it rewards in the human details, the book has little that would surprise a student of early-modern Catholic missions. As in other parts of Asia, we see the trampling of images as test of religious identity and anxiety about individuals being properly hatted and bearded. The many primary sources—documents in Latin and the romance vernaculars, found in Rome, Lisbon, Paris, Manila, and Goa—that animate the book make clear that this is no fault of the author. The sources are necessarily written by missionaries, and what impresses is how closely their challenges and solutions here (and how the authors presented here) match those of their co-religious in other parts of the world. It will be interesting as historians make increasing use of extant indigenous sources (which are, as Alberts reports, few and laconic) to see how, if at all, the account given here will be emended. Luke Clossey Simon Fraser University Burnaby, Canada Copyright © 2015 The Catholic University of America Press

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.064
Threshold uncertainty score0.805

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œCatholic historical reviewSame topicVietnamese History and Culture StudiesFrench-language works237,207