Fans with forests: contemporary hydrogeomorphic processes on fans with forests in west central British Columbia, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Alluvial and colluvial fans with forest cover are common in the valleys of west central British Columbia, Canada. Given the low population density of the region, most of these fans are uninhabited and the primary land use is forestry. The fans are desirable for timber harvesting due to the combination of the relatively easy access to their valley-bottom locations and their high-quality timber. However, they are also sites influenced by debris flows, debris floods and floods, and the interaction between conventional forest practices and these natural hydrogeomorphic processes has led to substantial financial costs and disturbance to forests and stream channels. Basic watershed morphometrics can be used to predict the dominant hydrogeomorphic process influencing forested fans. The hydrogeomorphically active zones of forested fans have characteristic site and stand features, and are referred to as the hydrogeomorphic riparian zone. Features within these zones can be used to determine the frequency and disturbance extent of hydrogeomorphic events. Appropriate management strategies can be developed to limit the effect of forestry activities on natural hydrogeomorphic processes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".