Unified production of chlorinated isotactic polypropylene and chlorinated paraffin via a solvent free chlorination process
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract An environmentally friendly method for producing chlorinated isotactic polypropylene (CIPP) with chlorine percentage of 28–35, by weight is proposed, in which a reactive solvent, paraffin, is used to replace the commonly used inert solvent of carbon tetrachloride (CTC), an ozone depleting substance being phased out under the Montreal Protocol. This method utilizes the principle that paraffin can dissolve isotactic polypropylene (IPP) at about 150°C and the resulting solution can be chlorinated concurrently, forming two useful products, viz. chlorinated paraffin (CP) and CIPP, which are mutually soluble even at lower temperature, e.g., 70°C. The present method is superior to the conventional CTC solvent method because it can reduce the solvent emission dramatically, enhance the volume efficiency of reactor, and achieve a unified production of CIPP and CP under atmospheric pressure. The structure and properties of CIPP produced by two different methods are determined by differential scanning calorimetry, attenuated total reflectance‐Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, proton magnetic resonance ( 1 H‐NMR), and 13 C‐NMR. The results indicate that IPP chain can be homogeneously chlorinated in paraffin as in CTC solvent via a radical mechanism. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 2009. © 2009 Society of Plastics Engineers
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".