MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2092878742 · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.72.225

Dipolar effects in magnetic thin films and quasi-two-dimensional systems

2000· article· en· W2092878742 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueReviews of Modern Physics · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicTheoretical and Computational Physics
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of NewfoundlandWestern UniversityTrent University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsFrustrationThin filmDipoleCondensed matter physicsRange (aeronautics)Chemical physicsPattern formationWork (physics)NanotechnologyMaterials scienceQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Thin films and quasi-two-dimensional systems show a wide range of ordering effects and related pattern-formation phenomena. The origins of these phenomena can often be traced to competition between the atomic (or molecular) interactions in the system and the resulting inherent frustration of the system. In magnetic thin films, a wide range of magnetic structures are possible as a result of the competition between the long-ranged dipolar interactions and localized interactions. This article reviews recent experimental and theoretical work which has developed our understanding of ordering and pattern formation in these films and in related structures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.574
Threshold uncertainty score0.592

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it