MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2092896035 · doi:10.1080/00103621003646055

Establishment of the Critical Limit of Soil-Available Phosphorous for Maize Production in Low Acidic Ultisols of West Africa

2010· article· en· W2092896035 on OpenAlexaff
B. V. Bado, François Lompo, Michel P. Sédogo, Michel P. Cescas

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUltisolTotal organic carbonAgronomyFertilizerSoil carbonZea maysChemistrySoil testManureAnimal sciencePoaceaeSoil waterEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental chemistryBiologySoil science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The relationship between yields and the Bray I–extractable phosphorous (P) was studied on a 21-year-old experiment with maize (Zea mays) in an acid Ultisol of West Africa. Chemical fertilizer alone decreased soil organic carbon and increased soil acidity. The applications of cattle manure maintained the highest level of soil organic carbon, and soil acidity did not decrease. The extractable P varied from 4 mg kg–1 (original soil) to 25 mg P ha–1 in fertilized treatments. A linear correlation (P < 0.01; r = 0.85) was found between soil extractable P and maize yields. Each unit increase in soil extractable P tallied with 16% of yield increase. A critical limit of soil extractable P of 15.6 mg P kg–1 was identified. Below this limit, maize produced less than 2500 kg ha–1, 80% of the maximum yield. Responses to P fertilizer were not expected above this limit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.195
Threshold uncertainty score0.952

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommunications in Soil Science and Plant AnalysisSame topicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsFrench-language works237,207