MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Proton Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopic Imaging Can Predict Length of Survival in Patients with Supratentorial Gliomas

2003· letter· en· W2092906204 on OpenAlexaff
Yevgeniy E. Kuznetsov, Zografos Caramanos, Samson Antel, Mark C. Preul, Richard Leblanc, Jean‐Guy Villemure, R. Pokrupa, André Olivier, Abbas F. Sadikot, Douglas L. Arnold

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurosurgery · 2003
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOligodendrogliomaMagnetic resonance spectroscopic imagingReceiver operating characteristicNuclear medicineMagnetic resonance imagingProportional hazards modelVoxelAstrocytomaProton magnetic resonanceCreatineSurvival analysisRadiologyInternal medicineGliomaNuclear magnetic resonance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: We compared the ability of proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging ((1)H-MRSI) measures with that of standard clinicopathological measures to predict length of survival in patients with supratentorial gliomas. METHODS: We developed two sets of leave-one-out logistic regression models based on either 1) intratumoral (1)H-MRSI features, including maximum values of a) choline and b) lactate-lipid, c) number of (1)H-MRSI voxels with low N-acetyl group values, and d) number of (1)H-MRSI voxels with high lactate-lipid values, all (a-d) of which were normalized to creatine in normal-appearing brain, or 2) standard clinicopathological features, including a) tumor histopathological grade, b) patient age, c) performance of surgical debulking, and d) tumor diagnosis (i.e., oligodendroglioma, astrocytoma). We assessed the accuracy of these two models in predicting patient survival for 6, 12, 24, and 48 months by performing receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Cox proportional hazards analysis was performed to assess the extent to which patient survival could be explained by the above predictors. We then performed a series of leave-one-out linear multiple regression analyses to determine how well patient survival could be predicted in a continuous fashion. RESULTS: The results of using the models based on (1)H-MRSI and clinicopathological features were equally good, accounting for 81 and 64% of the variability (r(2)) in patients' actual survival durations. All features except number of (1)H-MRSI voxels with lactate-lipid/creatine values of at least 1 were significant predictors of survival in the (1)H-MRSI model. Two features (tumor grade and debulking) were found to be significant predictors in the clinicopathological model. Survival as a continuous variable was predicted accurately on the basis of the (1)H-MRSI data (r = 0.77, P < 0.001; median prediction error, 1.7 mo). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that appropriate analysis of (1)H-MRSI data can predict survival in patients with supratentorial gliomas at least as accurately as data derived from more invasive clinicopathological features.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.618
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations63
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurosurgerySame topicAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207