MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2092922152 · doi:10.1190/1.1817142

Gabor deconvolution of seismic data for source waveform and Q correction

2002· article· en· W2092922152 on OpenAlexafffund
Gary F. Margravé, Michael P. Lamoureux, J.P. Grossman, Victor Iliescu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMitacs
KeywordsDeconvolutionWaveformComputer scienceGeologyAlgorithmTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a novel approach to nonstationary seismic deconvolution using the Gabor transform. This nonstationary transform represents a signal as a superposition of sinusoids that are localized by time-shifted windows. The resulting time-frequency decomposition is a suite of local Fourier transforms that facilitates nonstationary spectral analysis or filtering. In a result that generalizes the seismic convolutional model, we show that the Gabor transform of a nonstationary seismic signal is the product of source signature, Q filter, and reflectivity effects. We use this spectral factorization theorem as a basis for a new deconvolution algorithm in the Gabor domain. We estimate the Gabor spectrum of the underlying reflectivity directly from the Gabor spectrum of an attenuated seismic signal. Tests on synthetic and real data show that our method works well and combines the effects of sourcesignature inversion and a data-driven inverse Q filter. In comparison with a stationary Wiener deconvolution, our Gabor deconvolution is similar within the Wiener design gate and superior elsewhere.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSeismic Imaging and Inversion TechniquesFrench-language works237,207