Prototype Precision Applicator for Solid and Semisolid Livestock manure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The development of a solid and semi-solid manure land applicator capable of accuratedistribution can help increase the economic value of manure as a resource while lowering theenvironmental risk and negative social impacts of manure application. Dynamic control of theapplication rate in the field and the flexibility of several modes of application (surface banded, surfacebroadcast and banded incorporation) can contribute to make the management of solid and semi-solidmanure products in large quantities a more technologically and economically interesting alternativefor both livestock and field crop producers. A prototype land applicator was built based on the results from analysis of the physical andrheological properties of manure and lab-scale testing of different conveyors and components. Theprototype includes the frame from a commercial spreader, inclinable sidewalls, load cells, and ahydraulically driven gate at the back of the box to help control the flowrate of material into thetransverse conveyor. Two types of floor conveyors (scraper and screw conveyors) and two types oftransverse conveyors (belt and screw) were tested based on discharge rate (kg/s) and unit energyrequirements (J/kg or W per kg/s of discharge rate). The dynamic control of the manure application rate achieved through the adjustable gate andconveyor speed provided more accurate and precise manure application while the low impactspreading technique may decrease emissions after application, lowering nitrogen losses andodourous and greenhouse gas emissions. The transverse uniformity of distribution of the prototypeland applicator eliminates the need for overlap between adjacent passes, reducing the amount oftime spent in the field. Further cost savings may be achieved when considering the increased valueof the manure as fertilizer and lower negative environmental impact offered by precision manureapplication.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".