MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2092934739 · doi:10.1002/cnm.1149

A local multivariate Lagrange interpolation method for constructing shape functions

2008· article· en· W2092934739 on OpenAlexaff
Yunhua Luo

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNumerical methods in engineering
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterpolation (computer graphics)Kronecker deltaMultivariate statisticsUnivariateMultivariate interpolationMathematicsLagrange polynomialNearest-neighbor interpolationTrigonometric interpolationApplied mathematicsInverse quadratic interpolationMathematical optimizationTrilinear interpolationSpline interpolationFunction (biology)Multivariate analysisBilinear interpolationComputer scienceMathematical analysisStatisticsArtificial intelligencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this paper, the conventional global univariate Lagrange interpolation method is transformed into a local multivariate interpolation method. The method has the following attractive features: it can be used to interpolate irregularly distributed data points; it does not need to solve local problems; if used for constructing shape functions, the obtained shape functions satisfy the Kronecker delta condition and they have the reproducing properties. The performance of the local multivariate Lagrange interpolation method was examined by applying it to function approximation. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.384
Teacher spread0.349 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical EngineeringSame topicNumerical methods in engineeringFrench-language works237,207