MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Taking roots over high extensions of finite fields

2013· article· en· W2092948697 on OpenAlexaff
Javad Doliskani, Éric Schost

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematics of Computation · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCryptography and Residue Arithmetic
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsFinite fieldPure mathematicsAlgebra over a fieldDiscrete mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a new algorithm for computing m m -th roots over the finite field F q \mathbb {F}_q , where q = p n q = p^n , with p p a prime, and m m any positive integer. In the particular case m = 2 m=2 , the cost of the new algorithm is an expected O ( M ( n ) log ⁡ ( p ) + C ( n ) log ⁡ ( n ) ) O(\mathsf {M}(n)\log (p) + \mathsf {C}(n)\log (n)) operations in F p \mathbb {F}_p , where M ( n ) \mathsf {M}(n) and C ( n ) \mathsf {C}(n) are bounds for the cost of polynomial multiplication and modular polynomial composition. Known results give M ( n ) = O ( n log

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.101

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.009
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0300.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMathematics of ComputationSame topicCryptography and Residue ArithmeticFrench-language works237,207