La transmission des oeuvres d’art : du monument à l’art de l’interprétation. Les ruses de Christian Boltanski
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Depuis les années soixante, dans le champ des arts visuels, la multiplication des pratiques artistiques éphémères, idéelles (dont la réalisation matérielle n’est pas obligatoire) et exposées (dont l’intégrité requiert une mise en exposition) incitent les artistes et les conservateurs de musées à renouveler les modes de pérennisation et de transmission des oeuvres. La préservation traditionnelle de l’oeuvre dans sa forme originelle et dans son intégrité laisse place à de nouvelles stratégies. Le régime allographique qui autorise des réitérations multiples par d’autres personnes que l’artiste, à partir de prescriptions, constitue l’une des alternatives les plus radicales. Basé sur une série de l’artiste français Christian Boltanski, Les inventaires des objets ayant appartenu à... (1972-1995), ce texte analyse comment le mode allographique questionne et perturbe la logique du monument historique qui sous-tend la préservation des oeuvres d’art.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.022 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".