Bibliographic record
Abstract
Between 1890 and 1933, male birth fantasies became awidespread phenomenon in European culture. One ofthe key examples of male birth fantasies is Filippo TommasoMarinetti’s “African” novel Mafarka the Futurist.The novel’s protagonist, Mafarka, gives birth to a childby his will power and by drawing on diverse formationsof knowledge, from alchemy to theories of evolution. Inaddition to the consideration given the psycho-historical,cultural, and scientific contexts of male birth fantasiesin the avant-garde, the contribution reflects on siblingencryptment within the relationship to the motheras one more aspect of a span of genealogy one mightterm “Maternal Modernity.”Christine Kanz is Professor of German Literature atGhent University in Belgium. Her contribution refersto her 2009 book Maternale Moderne. Männliche Gebärphantasienzwischen Kultur und Wissenschaft, 1890-1933. In addition she edited several collections andauthored another book on Ingeborg Bachmann, andnumerous articles and reviews in the area of interdisciplinarystudies.Before entering the Academy of Fine Arts Karlsruhe,class of Daniel Roth, in 2008, Adam Cmiel trained invarious media in Bad Dürkheim, Hamburg, Mannheim,and Trier. He has participated in nine exhibitions sincethe onset of his studies in Karlsruhe.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".