MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2093016259 · doi:10.1021/ja993693w

A Quantum Chemical and Classical Transition State Theory Explanation of Negative Activation Energies in OH Addition To Substituted Ethenes

2000· article· en· W2093016259 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryReaction rate constantTransition state theoryAb initioHammett equationActivation energyComputational chemistryAdductBasis setPhysical chemistryThermodynamicsReaction mechanismDensity functional theoryKineticsQuantum mechanicsOrganic chemistryCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The OH addition to ethene has been modeled using ab initio quantum chemical calculations and classical transition state theory (CTST). The results agree with the hypothesis of Singleton and Cvetanovic (Singleton, D. L.; Cvetanovic, R. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1976, 98, 6812) that the reaction is not elemental, and that it consists of a reversible first step involving the formation of a prereactive complex, followed by the irreversible formation of an addition adduct. The overall rate depends on the rates of two competitive reactions, i.e., the reverse of the first step and the second step, the former being more favored by an increase in temperature than the latter. Applying CTST to the proposed mechanism, we obtain an overall rate constant of 11.7 × 10 - 12 cm 3 molecule - 1 s - 1, which agrees very well with the experimental results. New results for the activation energies of the OH addition to a series of substituted ethenes have also been obtained assuming that the above mechanism holds. The activation energies were calculated from projected second-order Moller−Plesset total energies obtained with the 6-311G** basis set. We find that a plot of these data vs the logarithm of the experimental rate constants has a correlation coefficient of 0.996. This seems to imply that the preexponential factor for the series should be approximately constant, in contradiction with the reported values for A . Moreover, a plot of our effective activation energies for OH addition vs the activation energies of a similar reaction, the addition of atomic oxygen to the same series of alkenes, also yields a good correlation. Indeed, for this reaction, the reported A factors are similar to each other. We suggest that the experimental Arrhenius parameters of the OH addition reaction need to be revised.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.068
Threshold uncertainty score0.376

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it